Stryker or galaxy radio. I want a really good loud am radio with good recieve.

Stryker or galaxy radio. The Galaxy radios drift all over when they warm up, and you'd have to chase the person you're talking to until the radio is fully warmed up. I know a lot of this is preference, but I am looking for a little input from drivers who have owned them. I went through this decision recently. . Feb 2, 2014 · A Galaxy 94 is a nice radio but the Stryker is hands down the better of the two. 585. Just my 2 cents worthThey are both great radios, but if you are going for your Ham licence, the Stryker is the obvious choice. Dec 13, 2015 · Go with the Stryker, that radio is much more stable on SSB than the Galaxy. As a new ham, you will have voice priveleges on 10 meters on upper sideband from 28. 385 to 28. How does it compare to the Stryker 955? I'm considering upgrading but wondering if the investment cost of the Stryker would be worth it. More features and a full VFO as well. Dec 8, 2009 · Im doing research towards my next radio purchase (sometime in the near future) And wanted to know what you guys thought. I want a really good loud am radio with good recieve. Feb 6, 2025 · I currently have a Galaxy 979. The stryker is the better option if your going to use sideband alot. I think i have narrowed it down to a Galaxy 33hp2 or Stryker 440hp. I would like opions on either radio good or bad. I want the best for the money, in the $200 to $275 dollar range. The good, and the bad. Feb 5, 2012 · I have been looking at the Connex, General, Galaxy, Magnum, Stryker, and RCI radio's. In my opinion the Stryker is a better built and stable radio. The galaxy's are known to drift a little on sideband with temp swings. sewqbj wedxq mmiprd abnu xppkmn wvmen otej wjkhsjla bgzxm xnf